> -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 13 April 2018 20:53 > To: Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com> > Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; Daniel Smith > <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>; Alexey G <x19...@gmail.com>; Stefano > Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>; Paul > Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>; Christopher Clark > <christopher.w.cl...@gmail.com>; Rich Persaud <pers...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger....@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those > time-slots. > > > > Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the > > following > week. > > > > If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this > > week works > that > > > > would be great. Otherwise please scream. > > > > > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, > > so I > > > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week > after. > > > Let's see what people think of the current dates. > > > > > > Roger. > > > > > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been > invalidated. > > > > > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > > > > Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. > > > > I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items > > because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely > > different (albeit all related to PCI). > > > > Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail > thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am > happy > to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes > > On the x86 side: > > - Q35 HVM emulation, adding MCFG support to guests.
One of the issues here is support for multiple external emulators w.r.t. config space access. > - PVH guest pci-passthrough: using the internal vPCI infrastructure. Let's not distinguish between HVM or PVH here. We want to use the same passthrough mechanisms for both. Cheers, Paul > > At least that I can think of ATM. > > Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
