On 14/06/2022 17:03, Jan Beulich wrote: > When some FMA set of insns is included in the base instruction set (XOP, > AVX512F, and AVX512-FP16 at present), simd_test() simply invokes > fma_test(), negating its return value. In case of a failure this would > yield a value close to 4G, which doesn't lend itself to easy > identification of the failing test case. Recognize the case in > simd_check_regs() and emit alternative output identifying FMA. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
