Hi Julien,
On 20.05.2022 14:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
>
> In a follow-up patch, we will want to populate the boot allocator
> separately for arm64. The code will end up to be very similar to the one
> on arm32. So move out the code in a new helper populate_boot_allocator().
>
> For now the code is still protected by CONFIG_ARM_32 to avoid any build
> failure on arm64.
>
> Take the opportunity to replace mfn_add(xen_mfn_start, xenheap_pages) with
> xenheap_mfn_end as they are equivalent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Patch added
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> index d5d0792ed48a..3d5a2283d4ef 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> @@ -637,10 +637,58 @@ static void __init init_staticmem_pages(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
> +/*
> + * Populate the boot allocator. All the RAM but the following regions
> + * will be added:
> + * - Modules (e.g., Xen, Kernel)
> + * - Reserved regions
> + * - Xenheap
> + */
> +static void __init populate_boot_allocator(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
Shouldn't this be an int (as it was previously) because ...
> + const struct meminfo *banks = &bootinfo.mem;
> +
> + for ( i = 0; i < banks->nr_banks; i++ )
... nr_banks is int ?
Apart from that:
Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@arm.com>
Cheers,
Michal
