On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > (This, as an aside, also makes pretty clear that - unlike the title > of the series suggests - this has nothing to do with gcc 11.)
I've started debugging this as reported as an issue associated with building with gcc 11, until I realized it was the assembler that was adding such section. I guess in my mind I still had the idea of fixing the build with gcc 11, and hence the misleading subject of the cover letter. The commit messages should be fine however. Thanks, Roger.
