On 07.03.2022 21:53, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,16 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kexec_image *image)
>       */
>      local_irq_disable();
>  
> +    /* Reset CPUID masking and faulting to the host's default. */
> +    ctxt_switch_levelling(NULL);
> +
> +    /* Disable CET. */
> +    if ( read_cr4() & X86_CR4_CET )
> +    {
> +        wrmsrl(MSR_S_CET, 0);
> +        write_cr4(read_cr4() & ~X86_CR4_CET);
> +    }
> +
>      /* Now regular interrupts are disabled, we need to reduce the impact
>       * of interrupts not disabled by 'cli'.
>       *

Besides introducing somewhat of a disconnect between the comment in
context here and the earlier local_irq_disable(), is it really
necessary to do both actions with IRQs off?

Jan


Reply via email to