On 24.02.2022 23:55, Julien Grall wrote: > On 16/02/2022 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 16.02.2022 08:20, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 15.02.22 22:13, Julien Grall wrote: >>>> As a side note, should we also update SUPPORT.md? >>> >>> Good question. >> >> I'm not sure here either - talking about individual hypercall sub-ops >> seems overly small granularity to me for this kind of doc. Plus I >> don't view deprecation and de-supporting as the same thing. The latter >> would mean to render unsupported any old XenoLinux which may still be >> in use, all of the sudden. > > I understand this would result to unsupport some old OSes (not clear how > old). However, from what Juergen said this feature is untested. > > To me it sound like we are not confident that we could security support > this feature. > > So I am not sure to understand why we only want to deprecate it.
Not sure what to say: Rendering unsupported however old guests is not a nice step. Hence my concern (which isn't an outright objection). Jan
