Re: [PATCH 01/11] dma-direct: use is_swiotlb_active in dma_direct_map_page

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 2/22/22 9:05 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the more specific is_swiotlb_active check instead of checking the
> global swiotlb_force variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/direct.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h
> index 4632b0f4f72eb..4dc16e08c7e1a 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_page(struct device 
> *dev,
>               return swiotlb_map(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
>  
>       if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true))) {
> -             if (swiotlb_force != SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)
> +             if (is_swiotlb_active(dev))
>                       return swiotlb_map(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
>  
>               dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1,
> 

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com>