On 24/02/2022 10:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> With version 2.7 I'm observing support for binary searches, but
> unreliable results: Only a subset of the supposed matches is actually
> reported; for our pattern I've never observed any match. This same
> version works fine when handing it a Perl regexp using hex or octal
> escapes. Probe for support of -P and prefer that over the original
> approach.
>
> Fixes: 4d037425dccf ("x86: Build check for embedded endbr64 instructions")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>Looks plausible. Tentative ack, but this definitely needs a full run through CI before committing. Let me kick something off. > --- > If we were to fear -P having a different meaning elsewhere, we may need > to switch to the respective long option (--perl-regexp). We can probably get away with -P. ~Andrew
