> On 18 Nov 2021, at 11:28, Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org> wrote: > > > > On 18/11/2021 11:14, Bertrand Marquis wrote: >> Hi Roger, >>> On 18 Nov 2021, at 10:37, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:01:08AM +0000, Bertrand Marquis wrote: >>>> Hi Roger, >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 18 Nov 2021, at 08:58, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:07:50PM +0000, Bertrand Marquis wrote: >>>>>> Hi Roger, >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 17 Nov 2021, at 09:53, Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Document some of the relevant changes during the 4.16 release cycle, >>>>>>> likely more entries are missing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> CHANGELOG.md | 11 +++++++++++ >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md >>>>>>> index ad1a8c2bc2..8b0bdd9cf0 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/CHANGELOG.md >>>>>>> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md >>>>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ The format is based on [Keep a >>>>>>> Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) >>>>>>> - qemu-traditional based device models (both, qemu-traditional and >>>>>>> ioemu-stubdom) will >>>>>>> no longer be built per default. In order to be able to use those, >>>>>>> configure needs to >>>>>>> be called with "--enable-qemu-traditional" as parameter. >>>>>>> + - Fixes for credit2 scheduler stability in corner case conditions. >>>>>>> + - Ongoing improvements in the hypervisor build system. >>>>>>> + - vtpmmgr miscellaneous fixes in preparation for TPM 2.0 support. >>>>>>> + - 32bit PV guests only supported in shim mode. >>>>>>> + - Improved PVH dom0 debug key handling. >>>>>>> + - Fix booting on some Intel systems without a PIT (i8254). >>>>>> >>>>>> Missing: >>>>>> - cpu ID sanitization on arm64 >>>>>> - fix 32/64bit vreg emulation on arm64 >>>>> >>>>> Can I get a bit more information about those items? Just a pointer to >>>>> the commit messages would be helpful so that I can try to write a more >>>>> comprehensive entry (or maybe it's just me not knowing anything about >>>>> Arm that fails to understand it). >>>> >>>> I agree, the text is not quite clear, I will try to come with a better one. >>>> In the meantime here is are links to the series: >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/list/?series=535805&state=* >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/list/?series=477151&archive=both >>> >>> Thanks. I've added: >>> >>> - CPU feature leveling on arm64 platform with heterogeneous cores. >> Yes >>> - Handle register accesses as 32/64bit on Arm depending on the processor >>> bitness. >> I would say: >> - Fix coprocessor register accesses on Arm to use the proper 32/64bit access >> size. > > I would suggest s/coprocessor/system/ because the changes was targeting arm64.
Agree Cheers Bertrand > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall
