On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 06:09:44 -0600 "Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 22.03.18 at 12:56, <x19...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I really don't understand why some people have that fear of emulated >> MMCONFIG -- it's really the same thing as any other MMIO range QEMU >> already emulates via map_io_range_to_ioreq_server(). No sensitive >> information exposed. It is related only to emulated PCI conf space >> which QEMU already knows about and use, providing emulated PCI >> devices for it. > >You continue to ignore the routing requirement multiple ioreq >servers impose. If the emulated MMCONFIG approach will be modified to become fully compatible with multiple ioreq servers (whatever they used for), I assume there will be no objections that emulated MMCONFIG can't be used? I just want to clarify this moment -- why people think that a completely emulated MMIO range, not related in any way to host's MMCONFIG may compromise something. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
