Hi Julien, > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org> > Sent: 2021年8月13日 0:55 > To: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > sstabell...@kernel.org; jbeul...@suse.com > Cc: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [XEN RFC PATCH 06/40] xen: decouple NUMA from ACPI in Kconfig > > Hi Wei, > > On 11/08/2021 11:23, Wei Chen wrote: > > In current Xen code only implments x86 ACPI-based NUMA support. > > s/implments/implements/
Got it. > > > So in Xen Kconfig system, NUMA equals to ACPI_NUMA. x86 selects > > NUMA by default, and CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA is hardcode in config.h. > > > > In this patch series, we introduced device tree based NUMA for > > Arm. > > The concept of patch series only applies to the ML. Once checked-in this > is only a series of commit. So I would write: > > "In a follow-up patch, we will introduce support for NUMA using the > Device-Tree". > > > That means we will have two NUMA implemetations, so in this > > s/implemetations/implementations/ > Thanks, I will update the commit log in next version. > > patch we decouple NUMA from ACPI based NUMA in Kconfig. Make NUMA > > as a common feature, that device tree based NUMA also can select it. > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall
