On 05/07/2021 16:16, Jan Beulich wrote: > _hcbuf_buf1 has been there only for a pointer comparison to validate > type compatibility. The same can be achieved by not using typeof() on > the definition of what so far was _hcbuf_buf2, as the initializer has > to also be type-compatible. Drop _hcbuf_buf1 and the comaprison; > rename _hcbuf_buf2. > > Since we're already using compiler extensions here, don't be shy and > also omit the middle operand of the involved ?: operator. > > Bring line continuation character placement in line with that of > related macros. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
