>>> On 16.03.18 at 16:42, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 16/03/18 15:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 16.03.18 at 15:29, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> Somewhat independently of this patch, I think we should assert that >>> flags are in the expected state in the return-to-guest path, so we >>> notice accidental breakage like this more easily. >> Not sure - nothing was broken here afaict, we just want to play >> safe. And as said the exit paths already force EFLAGS.IF to 1. > > It is only because of the pessimistic approach in a previous XSA fix > that this isn't an XSA itself.
That plus the patch moving the STI didn't go anywhere other than into staging so far. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
