On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:45:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 15.03.18 at 13:01, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 14.03.18 at 15:04, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > + process_pending_softirqs(); > >> > >> Careful - is this valid with a spin lock held? Note how e.g. > >> dump_domains() holds an RCU lock only. > > > > It works ATM, but I guess there could be issues if at some point the > > softirqs need to use the vpci lock. I will add a pair of unlock/lock > > around it. > > Provided that is safe.
Hm, msix could be freed under our feet, but I don't see any other obvious solution to this issue ATM. I think as a follow up I should move the vpci lock outside of the vpci struct. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
