>>> On 25.01.18 at 15:44, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 25/01/18 14:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 25.01.18 at 15:17, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> On 25/01/18 13:19, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> I think we want to have the same, to please AMD. I'd >>>> suggest to use alternative patching though (except again on the >>>> IST paths), but then again maybe in a follow-up patch. >>> I trust the later patches are suitable in the IST regard? >> I've responded to patch 7. What other later patches have anything >> IST-related? > > None, but my point was to inquire that your IST concern doesn't affect > this patch?
No, it was just to re-emphasize that I think we'd be better off not to patch any of the IST related code paths. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
