On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 02:54:25PM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> From: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@amazon.com>
>>
>> Our intention is for the Vixen guest to be deprivileged so we need
>> to avoid permitting access to each IRQ even though it is technically
>> the hardware domain.
>
> I'm still not sure I see why you need the vixen guest to be the
> hardware_domain. On the pv-shim work we managed to make the domu !=
> hardware_domain, and that seems to work just fine.

I just haven't tried it yet.  I'll take a shot today and see how hard it is.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Thanks, Roger.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to