On 05/12/2017 10:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 09:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 05.12.17 at 09:49, <osstest-ad...@xenproject.org> wrote:
>>> flight 116832 xen-unstable real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116832/ 
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>> including tests which could not be run:
>>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 10 windows-install  fail REGR. vs. 
>>> 116744
>> This is a blue screen, recurring, and has first been reported in flight
>> 116779, i.e. was likely introduced in the batch ending in commit
>> 4cd0fad645. Among those the most likely candidates appear to be
>> the SVM changes (the failures are all on AMD hardware). The logs
>> there also have huge amounts of "Unexpected nested vmexit",
>> albeit not directly connected with the failed test afaict.
> The unexpected nested vmexit is from a previous test, (and hopefully the
> nested virt test, as that path shouldn't be reachable elsehow).
>
> The windows boot which actually failed has:
>
> Dec  5 04:20:08.735216 (XEN) CR access emulation failed (1): d1v0 64bit @ 
> 0010:fffff8000ce9e4ab -> 66 f3 6d 48 8b 7c 24 08 c3 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
> Dec  5 04:21:49.555130 (XEN) stdvga.c:173:d1v0 entering stdvga mode
>
> which I expect is the root of the problem.

Yes - that is the cause of the problem.  The BSOD is a 0x3D (exception
not handled) referencing the same %rip as the CR emulation failure.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to