On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:41 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 01/03/17 14:53, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static s_time_t c2t(struct > > csched2_runqueue_data *rqd, s_time_t credit, struct c > > } > > > > /* > > - * Runqueue related code > > + * Runqueue related code. > > You realize we changed CODING_STYLE to not require a full stop if > there > was only one line? This isn't a complete sentence so I would leave > the > full stop out. > Now that you mention it, yes, I remember the thread. But my understanding of the results of such thread was actually a bit different from what you say and explain above.
So... > But that's just for future reference -- I don't care enough about > this > in general, I just wanted to raise it to your attention. :-) > ...that's been useful and much appreciated. Thanks! Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
