On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > Hi, Stefano, Jan! > 1. Stefano, are you still NOT considering adding > functionality to avoid memory copying? We discussed > this a little bit here [1].
Hi Oleksandr, these macros are the generic versions of what pvcalls and xen-9pfs need, and these protocols use memory copies. I cannot introduce memory sharing interfaces as part of this patch, because they wouldn't comply to pvcalls or xen-9pfs and I don't have another test case for them. But if you had a patch to introduce them in ring.h, I would be happy to help you review it. > 2. Will you also provide macros/inlines for fixed sized packets? > So, others do not reinvent the wheel again on top of your code. I thought I already did: you can read/write fixed sized packets using the two read/write_packet functions. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
