>>> On 21.02.17 at 07:19, <xuqu...@huawei.com> wrote: > On February 21, 2017 5:55 AM, Chao Gao wrote: >>On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:11:53AM +0000, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote: >>>The posted_intr_vector handler is not always pi_notification_interrupt. >>>If the vt-d PI is not enabled, the handler is event_check_interrupt.. >>>The VCPU_KICK_SOFTIRQ bit is set in pi_notification_interrupt , but not >>event_check_interrupt.. >>> >>OK. you are right. I think we can resolve it by replacing >>event_check_interrupt with pi_notification_interrupt. > > Sounds good to me. Note that there is more ' perfc_incr(ipis); ' in > event_check_interrupt().. I don't know what's the purpose..
That's a performance counter getting incremented (if such counters are enabled in the first place). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
