* Thomas Garnier <thgar...@google.com> wrote:
> > Okay, I guess I will have to wait for it to be integrated to
> > linux-next then. Or would you rather to it after this patch set is
> > added?
>
> Read your summary for the patchset of KVM cleanup, I will wait for it to
> reach
> linux-next to rebase and send the new iteration.
Note that to be able to apply your readonly-GDT series to the x86 tree I'll
need a
stable SHA1 to base it on.
Paolo, how stable, non-rebasing are the KVM tree commits? Once Andy's patches
hit
the KVM tree I could pull from you and order it so that I'd send it to Linus
only
after you sent your bits upstream. That would save us 3 months of patch
propagation latency.
Or should we keep Andy's KVM patches together with the GDT patches? Either
workflow works for me - it's your call as these are predominantly KVM changes.
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
