Since we are not using PIC and (at least currently) don't have IOAPIC we want to make sure that acpi_irq_model doesn't stay set to ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PIC (which is the default value). If we allowed it to stay then acpi_os_install_interrupt_handler() would try (and fail) to request_irq() for PIC.
Instead we set the model to ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM which will prevent this from happening. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> --- Changes in v3: * Moved update of acpi_irq_model to x86_init.oem.arch_setup() (i.e. after ACPI has been initialized so we know whether or not we have IOAPICs). Clarified comit message. * Moved xen_hvm_init_shared_info() into patch 4. arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c index d2144f7..6d406f3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c @@ -1672,6 +1672,16 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_start_kernel(void) } #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PVH + +static void xen_pvh_arch_setup(void) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI + /* Make sure we don't fall back to (default) ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PIC. */ + if (nr_ioapics == 0) + acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM; +#endif +} + static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void) { struct xen_memory_map memmap; @@ -1752,6 +1762,8 @@ void __init xen_prepare_pvh(void) wrmsr_safe(msr, (u32)pfn, (u32)(pfn >> 32)); init_pvh_bootparams(); + + x86_init.oem.arch_setup = xen_pvh_arch_setup; } #endif -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel