On Tue, Jan 10, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: > > The protocol was introduced before upstream had one, xen-3.0 vs. > > xen-3.x. I have not digged into 10 year old emails why it was done that > > way, if it was ever proposed for upstream inclusion. Meanwhile the > > upstream unplug is used since a two years. This patch would allow to run > > old SUSE domUs on new non-SUSE dom0s with qemu-trad. > Given that SuSE kernels are now using the new unplug protocol, I think > there's no longer any reason to stand on principle. We take a > practical approach for emulating other hypervisor interfaces (Hyper-V > and VMWare); making accomodation for "one of our own" seems pretty > reasonable. (I haven't reviewed the patch itself.)
So what should be done with the two patches? Are they acceptable for staging, or will they be rejected? Olaf
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
