>>> On 19.01.17 at 18:29, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/support.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/support.h > @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ enum hvm_copy_result hvm_copy_to_guest_phys( > paddr_t paddr, void *buf, int size); > enum hvm_copy_result hvm_copy_from_guest_phys( > void *buf, paddr_t paddr, int size); > +enum hvm_copy_result hvm_copy_to_guest_phys_vcpu( > + paddr_t paddr, void *buf, size_t size, struct vcpu *vcpu);
Btw., there being just five existing callers, I think we should rather change the existing function instead of adding yet another wrapper of __hvm_copy(). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
