> On Jan 24, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 13:35 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 23/01/17 15:40, George Dunlap wrote: >>> >>> Having a "cpupool-remove" operation that doesn't actually remove >>> the >>> cpu from the pool is a bit mad... >> >> Logically it does remove the cpu from Pool-0. It is just that there >> is >> no other scheduler entity involved for doing so. >> > Yes, it's removed from the pool, *but* it basically remains part of the > pool's scheduler, that's the issue.
And in particular for credit2, remains in the runqueue cpu mask (which is what this patch is mostly about). -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
