On 18/01/17 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote: > Note that the adjustment to the mode_64bit() definition is so that we > can avoid "#ifdef __x86_64__" around the 64-bit asm() portions. An > alternative would be single asm()s with a conditional branch over the > (manually encoded) REX64 prefix. > > Note that RORX raising #UD when VEX.VVVV is not all ones is matching > observed behavior rather than what the SDM says. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
