On 17-01-11 06:53:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.01.17 at 06:13, <yi.y....@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 17-01-10 06:46:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 14.12.16 at 05:07, <yi.y....@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > +int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type,
> >> > +                 uint32_t dat[], uint32_t array_len)
> >> > +{
> >> > +    struct psr_socket_info *info = get_socket_info(socket);
> >> > +    struct feat_node *feat_tmp;
> >> 
> >> With the hook function taking a pointer to const I don#t see why
> >> this one can't be const, too.
> >> 
> > Do you mean feat_tmp? Thanks!
> 
> Not sure why you ask - yes, that's why I've placed the comment at
> precisely this line.
> 
Got it, thanks!

> Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to