>>> On 22.12.16 at 09:12, <andr2...@gmail.com> wrote: > +struct xendispl_pg_flip_evt { > + uint64_t fb_cookie;
Considering that apparently all operations have this cookie, I think it would better go ... > +}; > + > +struct xendispl_req { > + uint16_t id; > + uint8_t operation; > + uint8_t reserved[5]; ... here. Other than that the primary thing I'm missing (as I think I've mentioned elsewhere already) is a rationale of why this new protocol is needed (and the existing xenfb one can't be extended). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel