On 01/03/2017 01:19 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> CC: George Dunlap <[email protected]>
>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
>> CC: Tim Deegan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> * No GPE0 update is needed anymore.
>>
>>  docs/misc/hvmlite.markdown | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/misc/hvmlite.markdown b/docs/misc/hvmlite.markdown
>> index 898b8ee..472edee 100644
>> --- a/docs/misc/hvmlite.markdown
>> +++ b/docs/misc/hvmlite.markdown
>> @@ -75,3 +75,14 @@ info structure that's passed at boot time (field 
>> rsdp_paddr).
>>  
>>  Description of paravirtualized devices will come from XenStore, just as it's
>>  done for HVM guests.
>> +
>> +## VCPU hotplug ##
>> +
>> +VCPU hotplug (e.g. 'xl vcpu-set <domain> <num_vcpus>') for PVHv2 guests
>> +follows ACPI model where change in domain's number of VCPUS (stored in
>> +domain.avail_vcpus) results in an SCI being sent to the guest. The guest
>> +then executes DSDT's PRSC method, updating MADT enable status for the
>> +affected VCPU.
>> +
>> +Updating VCPU number is achieved by having the toolstack issue a write to
>> +ACPI's XEN_ACPI_CPU_MAP.
> Looking at [email protected],
> this is done via domctl. I think it is worth documenting that.

Will do.

-boirs

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to