>>> "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.t...@intel.com> 12/23/16 6:48 AM >>> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 11:37 PM >> >>> On 22.12.16 at 16:14, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > My argument is that, instead of excluding the hook, the behaviour of the >> > emulation path should be made to function sensibly even on hardware >> > without vmfunc. >> > >> > i.e. drop the cpu_has_vmx_vmfunc check and do nothing else. >> >> Ah, I see. I guess I'll leave that to someone having an environment >> to test this. The patch's goal was to not change observable behavior. > >If later we'll have to again get hook always installed (for hardware w/o >vmfunc), I'm hesitant to ack this version...
While I can understand that response of yours, may I then ask that you (the VMX maintainers) submit a patch to follow Andrew's outline (unless he means to do so himself). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
