On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 03:14 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 07.12.16 at 19:29, <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > > ### x86 > > > > There is no HMP platform of relevance, for now, in x86 world. > > Therefore, > > only one class will exist, and all the CPUs will be set to belong > > to it. > > **TODO X86:** is this correct? > > What about the original Xeon Phi (on a PCIe card)? > Well, what I'd say about it is that I did not know about its existence. :-)
Anyway, if we have HMP on x86 already, and we want to support them, we'll have to define criteria for building classes there too. Once that is done, the rest of this document should be general enough (or at least that was the intent). About defining those criteria, I'd appreciate whatever input you x86 experts will be able to share. :-) Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
