>>> On 06.12.16 at 10:44, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: > On 06/12/16 09:51, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 06.12.16 at 09:33, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>> On 06/12/16 09:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> I'd like us to at least consider alternatives: >>>> >>>> 1) Have a new sub-op behaving BIOS like (one entry at a time). >>> >>> No objections from me. >>> >>>> 2) Make the full map available inside the initial mapping, pointed to >>>> by a new entry in the start info structure. >>> >>> What about PVH? >> >> Does PVH re-arrangement of its physical memory too? I didn't think >> so ... > > Not yet. Are you sure it won't be needed in future? Why was it done in > the pvops kernel? I thought the main reason was to have the same PCI > space address layout as on the native system in order to avoid any bad > surprises due to buggy firmware and/or BIOS. The same could apply for > PVH.
PVH Dom0 (iirc) gets its memory arranged around MMIO holes already (by the hypervisor). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
