>>> On 30.11.16 at 15:05, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: >> From: Andrew Cooper >> Sent: 30 November 2016 14:02 >> On 30/11/16 13:58, Paul Durrant wrote: >> > Also, anonymous unions are not part of C99 AFAIK... are we now stipulating >> something more recent? >> >> We used gnu99 for as long as I can remember, and we have other examples >> of this pattern already in Xen. >> > > If there's precedent then that's fine.
Tighter rules only apply for the public headers. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
