>>> On 23.11.16 at 19:13, <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Jan Beulich wrote: >> There's no point setting fields always receiving the same value on each >> iteration, as handle_ioreq() doesn't alter them anyway. Set state and >> count once ahead of the loop, drop the redundant clearing of >> data_is_ptr, and avoid the meaningless setting of df altogether. > > Why setting df is meaningless?
With count being fixed to one there's no need to update addresses, and hence no use for knowing which direction the updates should go. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
