Hello Andrii,
On 23/11/16 14:12, Andrii Anisov wrote:
But before you write any code, let me try to understand the real issue
first: you're trying to cross-build ARM tools on x86, but x86
iasl doesn't support ARM ACPI definition(s), right?
Well, as I stated here [1], I'm pretty far from ACPI and understanding
of what's going wrong with the compilation. But I have a strong
feeling that this option should be optional.
The ACPI support is pretty much contained in a single file and I am not
sure you will win much space. Can you explain why the ACPI guest support
should be optional?
Regards,
[1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-11/msg01903.html
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
