> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 22 November 2016 17:25 > To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Wei Liu > <wei.l...@citrix.com>; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Daniel DeGraaf > <dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov> > Subject: RE: [PATCH-for-4.9 v1 1/8] public / x86: Introduce > __HYPERCALL_dm_op... > > >>> On 22.11.16 at 17:32, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > >> Sent: 22 November 2016 15:57 > >> To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > >> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Wei Liu > >> <wei.l...@citrix.com>; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Daniel De Graaf > >> <dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-4.9 v1 1/8] public / x86: Introduce > >> __HYPERCALL_dm_op... > >> > >> >>> On 18.11.16 at 18:13, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > This patch simply adds the boilerplate for the hypercall and bumps > >> > __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ to 0x0000040900. > >> > >> Why the latter? > > > > Do I not need to bump the interface version? > > Not for plain additions. >
Oh, I see. The change is in preparation for later patches which remove HVMOP definitions for newer versions, but I can defer making the change till the first of those if that makes more sense. Paul > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
