On 11/15/2016 10:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> The other option was XEN_X86_EMU_ACPI. Would it be better? > As that's a little too wide (and I think someone else had also > disliked it for that reason), how about XEN_X86_EMU_ACPI_FF > (for "fixed features"), or if that's still too wide, break things up > (PM1a, PM1b, PM2, TMR, GPE0, GPE1)?
I think this may be a bit too fine-grained. Fixed-features would be good, but is GPE block considered part of fixed features? -boris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
