On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:33:11PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 11/11/16 15:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> On 11.11.16 at 16:16, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:50:24AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > >>> Currently hypervisor provides PV guest's CPUID(1).EBX[31:24] (initial > >>> APIC ID) with contents of that field on the processor that launched > >>> the guest. This results in the guest reporting different initial > >>> APIC IDs across runs. > >>> > >>> We should be consistent in how this value is reported, let's set > >>> it to 0 (which is also what Linux guests expect). > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> > >> I will defer this to x86 maintainers. > > Changing from a random (wrong) value to a deterministic (but still > > wrong) value certainly won't make things worse. IOW the patch > > can have my ack if needed, but I thought I had seen Andrew > > already give his. > > I don't think I had explicitly, but here... > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Applied. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
