>>> On 29.10.16 at 10:59, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > It doesn't make sense since the idle domain doesn't receive any events. This > is relevant in order to be sure that hypercall_preempt_check is not called > by the idle domain, which would happen previously when calling > {hap/sh}_set_allocation during domain 0 creation.
AIUI this describes the state of things before this series, not before this patch. I wonder whether this wouldn't better be folded into the previous patch, with the commit message slightly adjusted. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel