On 27/09/16 16:19, David Vrabel wrote: > On 27/09/16 15:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> I will be dusting off Linux domU PVHv2 patches now that ACPI changes are >> getting close to being accepted. >> >> Last version of that patch referred to these guests as 'hvmlite', >> including in names of variables, routines etc. I was hesitant to remove >> "classic" PVH code and use "pvh" instead of "hvmlite" because we didn't >> have dom0 v2 support and so I kept existing PVHv1 code intact. >> >> Do we still want to do this (i.e. keep v1 code and use "hvmlite")? FWIW, >> I am not aware of anyone using PVH dom0 (or PVH domU for that matter). > > I think we should remove the PVHv1 code from Linux and then reuse the > "pvh" name.
+1 Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
