On 2016-09-07 13:19:00 [-0400], Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > * Be more careful with return value of cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() > as it may return a positive (non-error) number. (Which suggests > that comment on top of __cpuhp_setup_state() is probably incorrect)
Yes, we need to update that one. The two patches look good. Sebastian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
