>>> On 05.09.16 at 13:19, <li...@eikelenboom.it> wrote: > On 2016-09-05 12:25, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Anyway - with you quite clearly having used HAP before, I can't >> see how this commit would matter for you at all. In case you want >> to double check you could try with a hypervisor built without >> shadow paging code (which we've been allowing for quite a >> while). > > I just tried that and without shadow paging code the guest boots fine, > so that's interesting.
Indeed. Was that try with plain staging/master, or with much of the reverts in place (from the bisection)? It seems to me that investigating this odd difference would perhaps be a better route than trying to guess what's wrong with said commit. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
