Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] libxl: make firmware_override able to
cope with relative path"):
> On 08/08/16 17:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > My example was disk images.
>
> I fail to see why any question of disk image is relevant here.
It is relevant because we want a coherent answer to "how does libxl
interpret relative pathnames in domain and device configuration".
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
