On 18/07/16 15:09, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 18/07/16 16:03, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 16:23 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 14:52 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> On 15/07/16 13:52, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>>>> Therefore, I still think this patch is correct, but I'm up for >>>>> investigating further and finding a way to solve the "zombie in >>>>> cpupool" issue as well. >>>> I'm not saying your patch is wrong. I just wanted to give you a >>>> hint >>>> about the history of the stuff you are changing. :-) >>>> >>> Sure, and that's much appreciated! :-) >>> >>>> If it is working I'd really prefer it over the current situation. >>>> >>> Right. I've got to leave now. But I'll produce some zombies on >>> Monday, >>> and will see if they move. :-D >>> >> Here you go: >> >> http://pastebin.com/r93TGCZU >> >> Is that "vm1 -b-" --> "(null) ---" domain zombie enough? > > Yes, seems to be okay for a zombie. > >> If yes, as you can see, it moves to cpupool0 while being destroyed, and >> I can destroy the pool without problems. > > Great. > >> I also shutdown the system with the domain still there (in cpupool0), >> and it works. > > Fine. You can add > > Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> And queued. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
