I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c b/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c
index 79865b8..0a8cad2 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-balloon.c
@@ -124,10 +124,10 @@ BALLOON_SHOW(current_kb, "%lu\n", 
PAGES2KB(balloon_stats.current_pages));
 BALLOON_SHOW(low_kb, "%lu\n", PAGES2KB(balloon_stats.balloon_low));
 BALLOON_SHOW(high_kb, "%lu\n", PAGES2KB(balloon_stats.balloon_high));
 
-static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(schedule_delay, 0444, balloon_stats.schedule_delay);
-static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(max_schedule_delay, 0644, 
balloon_stats.max_schedule_delay);
-static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(retry_count, 0444, balloon_stats.retry_count);
-static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(max_retry_count, 0644, balloon_stats.max_retry_count);
+static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(schedule_delay, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, 
balloon_stats.schedule_delay);
+static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(max_schedule_delay, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | 
S_IROTH, balloon_stats.max_schedule_delay);
+static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(retry_count, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, 
balloon_stats.retry_count);
+static DEVICE_ULONG_ATTR(max_retry_count, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | 
S_IROTH, balloon_stats.max_retry_count);
 
 static ssize_t show_target_kb(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute 
*attr,
                              char *buf)
-- 
2.9.2


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to