I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c 
b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
index 8e67336..e1fb906 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 #include "conf_space_quirks.h"
 
 bool xen_pcibk_permissive;
-module_param_named(permissive, xen_pcibk_permissive, bool, 0644);
+module_param_named(permissive, xen_pcibk_permissive, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | 
S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /* This is where xen_pcibk_read_config_byte, xen_pcibk_read_config_word,
  * xen_pcibk_write_config_word, and xen_pcibk_write_config_byte are created. */
-- 
2.9.2


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to