Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] acpi: Re-license ACPI builder files
from GPLv2 to LGPLv2.1"):
> On 07/15/2016 01:43 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Boris Ostrovsky writes ("[PATCH RFC] acpi: Re-license ACPI builder files
> > from GPLv2 to LGPLv2.1"):
> >
> >> I added the notice to mk_dsdt.c which didn't have any. The notice
> >> may not be required since mk_dsdt is Xen build tool and is
> >> not shipped but I added it for consistency.
> > The tool does not a licence statement.
>
> You meant "does not *need* a license statement" I assume.
I meant "does need". "not" was a mistake.
> What about the Makefile then? It has GPLv2 now and I changed it to LGPL.
That also needs fixing, indeed.
Sorry for the confusion.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
