There's no point in having default cases when all possible values have
respective case statements, or when there's just a "break" statement.

Otoh the two main switch() statements better get default cases added,
just to cover the case of someone altering one of the two lookup arrays
without suitably changing these switch statements.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
---
v2: use ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() in favor of BUG(), and log a message once.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ decode_segment(uint8_t modrm_reg)
     case 3: return x86_seg_ds;
     case 4: return x86_seg_fs;
     case 5: return x86_seg_gs;
-    default: break;
     }
     return decode_segment_failed;
 }
@@ -1503,6 +1502,19 @@ int x86emul_unhandleable_rw(
     return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
 }
 
+static void internal_error(const char *which, uint8_t byte,
+                           const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+#ifdef __XEN__
+    static bool_t logged;
+
+    if ( !test_and_set_bool(logged) )
+        gprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Internal error: %s/%02x [%04x:%08lx]\n",
+                which, byte, regs->cs, regs->eip);
+#endif
+    ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
+}
+
 int
 x86_emulate(
     struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
@@ -2996,8 +3008,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             case 7: /* fdivr */
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memsrc("fdivrs", src.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3128,8 +3138,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             case 7: /* fidivr m32i */
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memsrc("fidivrl", src.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3352,8 +3360,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             case 7: /* fidivr m16i */
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memsrc("fidivrs", src.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3431,8 +3437,6 @@ x86_emulate(
                 dst.type = OP_MEM;
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memdst("fistpll", dst.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3750,8 +3754,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             }
             break;
         }
-        default:
-            goto cannot_emulate;
         }
         break;
 
@@ -3845,10 +3847,12 @@ x86_emulate(
             goto push;
         case 7:
             generate_exception_if(1, EXC_UD, -1);
-        default:
-            goto cannot_emulate;
         }
         break;
+
+    default:
+        internal_error("primary", b, ctxt->regs);
+        goto cannot_emulate;
     }
 
  writeback:
@@ -4815,6 +4819,10 @@ x86_emulate(
             break;
         }
         break;
+
+    default:
+        internal_error("secondary", b, ctxt->regs);
+        goto cannot_emulate;
     }
     goto writeback;
 



x86emul: drop pointless and add useful default cases

There's no point in having default cases when all possible values have
respective case statements, or when there's just a "break" statement.

Otoh the two main switch() statements better get default cases added,
just to cover the case of someone altering one of the two lookup arrays
without suitably changing these switch statements.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
---
v2: use ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() in favor of BUG(), and log a message once.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ decode_segment(uint8_t modrm_reg)
     case 3: return x86_seg_ds;
     case 4: return x86_seg_fs;
     case 5: return x86_seg_gs;
-    default: break;
     }
     return decode_segment_failed;
 }
@@ -1503,6 +1502,19 @@ int x86emul_unhandleable_rw(
     return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
 }
 
+static void internal_error(const char *which, uint8_t byte,
+                           const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+#ifdef __XEN__
+    static bool_t logged;
+
+    if ( !test_and_set_bool(logged) )
+        gprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Internal error: %s/%02x [%04x:%08lx]\n",
+                which, byte, regs->cs, regs->eip);
+#endif
+    ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
+}
+
 int
 x86_emulate(
     struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
@@ -2996,8 +3008,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             case 7: /* fdivr */
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memsrc("fdivrs", src.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3128,8 +3138,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             case 7: /* fidivr m32i */
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memsrc("fidivrl", src.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3352,8 +3360,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             case 7: /* fidivr m16i */
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memsrc("fidivrs", src.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3431,8 +3437,6 @@ x86_emulate(
                 dst.type = OP_MEM;
                 emulate_fpu_insn_memdst("fistpll", dst.val);
                 break;
-            default:
-                goto cannot_emulate;
             }
         }
         break;
@@ -3750,8 +3754,6 @@ x86_emulate(
             }
             break;
         }
-        default:
-            goto cannot_emulate;
         }
         break;
 
@@ -3845,10 +3847,12 @@ x86_emulate(
             goto push;
         case 7:
             generate_exception_if(1, EXC_UD, -1);
-        default:
-            goto cannot_emulate;
         }
         break;
+
+    default:
+        internal_error("primary", b, ctxt->regs);
+        goto cannot_emulate;
     }
 
  writeback:
@@ -4815,6 +4819,10 @@ x86_emulate(
             break;
         }
         break;
+
+    default:
+        internal_error("secondary", b, ctxt->regs);
+        goto cannot_emulate;
     }
     goto writeback;
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to