On 7/1/2016 10:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.07.16 at 09:15, <cz...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
Fix vm-event section of MAINTAINERS file.
Would be nice to mention here which commit(s) caused these to go
out of sync with the actual code.
Why?
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -402,10 +402,14 @@ M: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>
M: Tamas K Lengyel <ta...@tklengyel.com>
S: Supported
F: xen/common/mem_access.c
-F: xen/*/vm_event.c
-F: xen/*/monitor.c
+F: xen/common/vm_event.c
+F: xen/arch/*/vm_event.c
+F: xen/common/monitor.c
+F: xen/arch/*/monitor.c
+F: xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c
F: xen/include/*/mem_access.h
F: xen/include/*/monitor.h
+F: xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/monitor.h
F: xen/include/*/vm_event.h
F: tools/tests/xen-access
Please at least don't make (un)sorted-ness worse than it was.
Jan
Please at least mention how these were sorted (/unsorted). They are
currently sorted, just not alphabetically (common before arch, grouped
by file, .c before .h).
How do you want me to sort them? Be specific (and don't make me guess
the rules, where is this written? if not written anywhere, how should I
adjust CODE_STYLE to fix that?).
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
