On 28 June 2016 at 14:06, Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ard, > > On 28/06/16 12:39, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> On 25 June 2016 at 09:16, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org> >>> >>> Add ACPI support for Virt Xen ARM and only for aarch64. It gets the >>> ACPI tables through Xen ARM multiboot protocol. >>> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 >>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org> >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> >> >> Committed as 402dde68aff9 > > > We have not yet agreed on the bindings between Xen and UEFI (see patch [1]). > How EDK2 deal with compatibility if we decide to modify the bindings for > whatever reasons? >
Thanks for emphasizing that. It would have been good to mention it in the commit log. Since this is all under development, I would prefer only the final version of the binding to be supported (if it deviates from the one this patch implements). As soon as anything ends up in a Xen release, we can discuss again whether we need to support different versions of the binding. Thanks, Ard. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
